Goals and objectives are instrumental in strategic planning for archives because they turn the project’s vision into measurable targets. Goals are the ends towards which a project is directed; objectives are more detailed than goals and explain how goals will be accomplished. With both in hand, archivists build and support the vision for what they wish to achieve with their projects.

Goal-Setting

Goals describe the purpose of the archival project, while objectives express the steps necessary to achieve goals. The goals should be prioritized, so the team knows which goal is most important if a trade-off needs to be made. Document each goal and tie it to the project vision. Goals describe what you want to achieve in non-technical terms, and they should align with organizational strategy. They clearly define the outcome of the project so that everyone understands what is to be accomplished.

A goal statement is a point of reference for any questions that arise regarding the project’s scope or purpose. The sponsor and project manager must set expectations and encourage the refinement of the goals so that the team gains ownership of the project, builds cooperation, and reduces areas of conflict.

A goal should be presented in such a way that one can determine if it has been achieved. If the goal of the project is to produce a deliverable with a specified quality at a particular time and within a cost limit, it is easy to check whether the goal is achieved. Goal statements should be short and to the point. The goals should exclude any information that might commit the project to impractical dates or deliverables.

Discovering Objectives

Goals need to be translated into objectives if they are to be used for planning and guiding the project’s assessment. Objectives should define what is to be achieved, when it will be completed, and how it will be performed. Objectives are a more detailed version of the goal statements. The purpose of objective statements is to clarify the boundaries of the goals and define the scope of your project. Objectives specify a future state, rather than an activity.

They are statements that tell the project team what result is to be achieved. Problem-solving to determine methods of reaching objectives should be kept open so that solutions can be determined later. If the approach is written into the objectives, it may lock a team into a method that is unsuitable for the project in the long run.

Objectives range widely. Financial objectives refer to the budgets themselves or to the standards organizations employ to assess their performance. Examples of financial objectives include staying within budget, increasing revenue or profit, or cutting costs. Performance objectives include meeting deadlines, satisfying requirements, or conforming to specifications. Technical objectives relate to the implementation or improvement of technology. Quality objectives represent improvements in services.

Prioritizing objectives may help eliminate tasks if the commitment to your budget or completing the project on time becomes an issue. Priorities will also assist you if you need to reorganize the project or deploy team members. If two people are completing a task, and assistance is required with another task associated with a higher priority objective, you will be able to adjust the efforts to be most useful.

Being Smart about Objectives

Use the word SMART to remind yourself of the areas to consider when setting objectives. The acronym stands for specific, measurable, accurate, realistic, and time bound. Specific objectives tell exactly what, where, and how to address the need. Measurable objectives have metrics in place so that you know whether you have succeeded or not. Accurate objectives should be described in a precise manner, so errors are nonexistent. Realistic objectives should be achievable in the time allowed. Time bound objectives must include a precise date for achievement. You may also consider writing SMARTER objectives that are extending and rewarding. The objectives should stretch or extend the capabilities of the organization. Rewarding objectives may be more difficult to gauge, but the achievement of an objective that serves the parent body will often translate into greater support for the organization and the project in future.

Goals and Objectives: An Example

For an archives, one goal of a project could be to increase the use of primary sources in history education by encouraging cooperation between historical records repositories and educators. Several objectives may stem from that goal. For example, one objective may be to support a project of history educators and archivists to create history curriculum based on analog and electronic records. Another objective may be to develop models for student tours and the use of archival facilities. These objectives can be further broken down into activities, performance indicators, and possible leads for partnerships.

Being Flexible

As in planning, the process of developing objectives is continuous. As information becomes available, and as the project progresses, modifications that contribute to the achievement of the completed project should be made to the objectives. In the planning phase, the project is in flux, so archivists can revise their objectives later as they receive more information about their project

The blog was originally published on Lucidea's blog.

GET STARTED

Looking for archival advising, records management, and historical research services? Click below to speak with an expert consultant.

Contact

Read Related Posts

Strategic Planning for Sustainable Archives

Archives often operate in environments defined by scarcity of space, staff, time, and funding. In these conditions, every decision carries weight. Without a plan, archives risk spreading their resources too thin, responding only to immediate crises, and missing opportunities for growth and impact. Strategic planning serves as a lifeline, providing archivists with a structured approach to prioritize, allocate resources, and communicate the value of their work to stakeholders.

Resilient Archival Practices

Archivists have long recognized patterns of limited funding that shape their institutions, yet they have consistently responded with creativity, commitment, and innovation. Even when resources are scarce, archives continue to find ways to build and maintain essential infrastructure and strengthen public engagement. Each challenge underscores the importance of archivists’ labor and provides an opportunity to advocate for the central role archives play in their communities.

The Importance of Highlighting the Labor of Archivists

Archives safeguard treasures, including objects like the founding documents of a nation and photographs of defining cultural moments. These holdings inspire a sense of connection to the past, and at the heart of that work are archivists whose expertise brings these collections to life.

The Power of Shared Archival Infrastructure and Consortia Models

No archives is an island. Especially in resource-constrained environments, collaboration through shared infrastructure provides a lifeline. Consortia models turn scarcity into opportunity by spreading costs and expertise across multiple archives. By pooling resources, institutions achieve more than they could alone.

5 Scalable Best Practices for Small or Resource-Constrained Archives

Well-resourced institutions have developed archival best practices, including comprehensive finding aids, climate-controlled storage, and digital preservation systems. For small or resource-constrained archives, these standards can feel out of reach. The danger is that the profession’s ideals may discourage institutions from taking action, leaving records vulnerable. The solution lies in paring down practices and procedures without abandoning principles.

How to Strengthen Your Archives with Limited Resources

Many archives exist within environments of chronic underfunding. Community archives, small historical societies, or lone arrangers may work with little more than donated materials, a handful of volunteers, and minimal budgets.

However, these institutions remain vital, safeguarding the histories of communities often absent from mainstream narratives. Scarcity shapes their reality, yet it can still allow meaningful work.

Reclaiming the Value of Archivists in the Digital Age

Humanity produces more digital content than at any other point in history. Every click, message, and post contributes to an expanding universe of data that represents the cultural memory of our time. At the center of this transformation stand archivists, the professionals uniquely trained to ensure that memories survive in the future. However, even as the scale of the challenge grows, their voices risk being sidelined in public conversations about digital preservation.

Slow Archiving: 6 Ways for Archivists to Engage Mindfully

In recent years, the concept of “slow librarianship” has emerged as a thoughtful response to the accelerating pace and pressures placed upon library professionals. Drawing inspiration from the broader slow movement, it emphasizes care, reflection, ethics, and people-centered work over speed and efficiency.

The Rise of Gig and Contract Work in Archives

The archival profession is characterized by dedication to public memory, cultural preservation, and service. However, beneath this noble mission lies a troubling reality: the increasing reliance on gig and contract labor.

The Power of Oral Histories and Embodied Memory in Archives

Written documents have long occupied a privileged position in archives as the most authoritative memory source. However, this excludes vast repositories of knowledge that reside outside the written word, especially within Indigenous communities, where memory is often preserved and transmitted through oral traditions, performance, storytelling, ceremony, and embodied practices.

Rethinking Archival Description Through Decolonial Lenses

Archival description is often treated as a neutral or technical task: summarizing contents, assigning subject headings, and organizing metadata for retrieval. However, description is actually far from neutral. It shapes how users interpret records, which narratives are centered, and whose voices are made visible or erased.

Honoring Cultural Protocols in Archival Practice

As the archival profession reckons with the legacies of colonialism, more institutions and practitioners are turning toward Indigenous and decolonial approaches that reframe traditional archival practice. Central to this shift is recognizing cultural protocols and community-defined rules governing how knowledge is created, shared, accessed, and preserved. Cultural protocols are foundational to ethical, respectful, and reciprocal relationships between archives and Indigenous communities.

Decolonial Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge

In recent decades, Indigenous communities and archivists have challenged the dominant frameworks that have long shaped archival practice. Traditionally, Western archival models have prioritized state authority, institutional control, and the presumption of neutrality. These models often fail to reflect Indigenous worldviews, community needs, or the rights of Indigenous peoples over their records and heritage.

The Ethical Use of Born-Digital Materials in Archives

As archival practice shifts to meet the challenges of the digital age, the ethical use of born-digital materials has become one of the most pressing concerns for archivists. These materials—emails, websites, text messages, digital photographs, spreadsheets, social media posts, and more—are created and stored digitally from their inception.

Agents of Deterioration and Preservation Strategies

The fundamental principles of archival preservation focus on the agents of deterioration, preventive conservation, and essential preservation strategies applied in archival settings.

Tax-Deductible Treasures: The “Difficult Art” of Monetary Appraisal for Archives

The monetary appraisal of archives and manuscripts is a critical yet underexplored intersection of library science and financial valuation. This article addresses the persistent knowledge gap between archival assessment and fiscal valuation and provides an overview of the monetary appraisal process in the United States. It focuses on concluding the fair market value (FMV) of noncash charitable contributions, a process governed by Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regulations and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). By documenting practices and terminology, the article serves as a resource for archivists navigating the complexities of donor relations and institutional stewardship. It advocates for increased fiscal literacy within the archival profession, suggesting that an integrated understanding of market dynamics and stewardship costs is essential for the care and financial substantiation of collections.

Best Practices for Archival Storage: Materials and Planning Essentials

Proper archival storage is one of the most critical aspects of archival preservation. In addition to housing collections in a dedicated archival storage room, using suitable storage materials and enclosures helps protect archival collections from environmental damage, physical wear, and chemical deterioration.

Balancing Collection- and Item-Level Information in Archival Description

One of the core challenges archivists face is determining the appropriate description level for materials in their collections. From broad collection-level overviews to granular item-level details, descriptive hierarchies play a crucial role in conveying the context and structure of archival materials.

Best Practices in Archival Description

Description is a cornerstone of archival practice, providing the means for users and archivists to understand, access, and interpret materials.

Practical Strategies for Arranging Mixed-Media Archives

Mixed-media archives, which contain physical and digital records, present unique challenges for archival arrangement. These collections require archivists to develop strategies that address the different needs of physical and digital materials while maintaining the collection’s coherence and accessibility.

Arranging Digital Archives: 4 Unique Challenges for Modern Archivists

Digital records have introduced new challenges to traditional archival arrangement practices. While the principles of original order and provenance remain relevant, the nature of digital materials requires archivists to adapt these principles to new formats and technologies.

Original Order and Provenance in Archival Arrangement

Archival arrangement organizes and structures archival materials to ensure efficient management, access, and preservation.

Redaction in Archives

Redaction in archival work—obscuring or removing sensitive information from records—has become a central concern in contemporary archival ethics. As archives increasingly acquire born-digital records and digitize historical collections for online access, archivists must grapple with data privacy, access, transparency, and potential harm.

Data Privacy in Archives

Archives have traditionally focused on preserving historical records, ensuring access, and maintaining the integrity of collections. However, in the digital age, the moral responsibilities of archivists have grown more complex.

Ethical Approaches to Surveillance in Archives

Archives have long been viewed as bastions of memory, preservation, and historical accountability. However, archivists must confront ethical questions in an era of digital surveillance, data harvesting, and global information flows.

Designing for Emotional Engagement in Archives

As archival institutions evolve from custodians of information to facilitators of memory and meaning-making, emotional engagement has become a vital, though often overlooked, dimension of archival design.

Designing Accessible Archives: Rethinking the Reading Room Experience

Archival reading rooms have long been the centerpiece of public access to collections. They are where researchers engage with historical documents, where discovery becomes tangible, and where the institutional identity of an archives is most visibly embodied.

How to Develop User-Centered Archival Discovery Tools with Design Thinking

Archival discovery tools, such as catalogs, finding aids, search interfaces, and digital repositories, are often the first point of contact between users and collections. These tools serve as maps and compasses, guiding users through vast and often complex holdings.

Design Thinking in Archives

Design thinking has become a widely adopted approach in fields ranging from technology to education, prized for emphasizing empathy, experimentation, and iterative problem-solving. For archives, traditionally shaped around internal workflows and professional conventions, design thinking presents an opportunity to reimagine outreach and engagement strategies from users’ perspectives.

How to Create Neurodiverse-Friendly Archives

As the archival profession embraces a broader commitment to accessibility and equity, it must consider how design choices affect neurodivergent archives users.