Creating a collection development policy involves setting objectives that guide the growth and management of collections.
These objectives serve as the compass that directs the acquisition, preservation, and accessibility efforts of an archives. Archivists understand the importance of identifying collection development objectives and how they shape the purpose and direction of an archives.
Aligning with the Archival Mission
Collection development objectives should align closely with the mission statement of the archives. By establishing clear objectives, archivists ensure that every acquisition and preservation decision contributes to the overall purpose of the institution. Whether preserving local history, supporting scholarly research, or promoting cultural heritage, the objectives set the stage for building purposeful and impactful archives.
One significant objective of an archives may be to support educational and research endeavors. By identifying this objective, archivists can shape their collection development strategies to acquire materials that align with the academic interests of their intended audience. This may involve partnering with educational institutions, providing resources for student projects, or developing research-oriented collections that enrich scholarly pursuits.
Many archives have the objective of preserving and promoting cultural heritage. These archives serve as vital repositories of artifacts, documents, and records that reflect a particular group’s history, traditions, and values. By identifying cultural heritage preservation as a core objective, archivists can focus on acquiring materials that safeguard and celebrate the unique heritage of the archives’ audience.
Fostering Communities
Archives can play a significant role in fostering community engagement. By identifying community engagement as an objective, archivists can develop collection strategies that resonate with the interests and needs of the local community. This may involve organizing public exhibitions, hosting events, or seeking input in collection development decisions. Engaging the community creates a sense of ownership and connection with the archives’ collections.
One crucial objective for many archives is to ensure inclusivity and representation. Archives have the power to address historical gaps and amplify underrepresented voices. By identifying this objective, archivists can actively seek materials representing diverse perspectives, marginalized communities, and historically overlooked narratives. This objective encourages the acquisition of materials that challenge traditional narratives and provide a more comprehensive understanding of history and culture.
Archives can serve as catalysts for social change and advocacy. Archivists can actively acquire materials documenting social movements, human rights struggles, and historical transformative moments by identifying advocacy and social justice as collection development objectives. These collections provide a platform for education, awareness, and promoting social justice causes.
Balancing Quantity and Quality
An essential objective in collection development is to strike a balance between quantity and quality. While it may be tempting to acquire an extensive range of materials, it is equally essential to ensure that the materials meet specific quality standards and align with the objectives of the archives. Focus on acquiring historically significant, authentic, and relevant materials.
Identifying collection development objectives is vital in creating purposeful and impactful archives. By aligning with the archives’ mission, supporting educational and research endeavors, preserving cultural heritage, fostering community engagement, representing underrepresented voices, supporting advocacy, and balancing quantity and quality, archivists can shape their collection development strategies to reflect the institution’s core values and goals. These objectives provide a roadmap for acquiring, preserving, and providing access to materials that serve the target audience’s needs and make the archives a valuable resource for education, research, and social impact.
A Guiding Framework
Archivists play a crucial role in creating purposeful archives through the implementation of a well-defined collection development policy. This policy serves as a guiding framework that ensures the archives acquires materials that align with its mission and objectives. They establish criteria for evaluating potential acquisitions, considering factors such as historical significance, uniqueness, and relevance to the archives’ designated subject areas. The collection development policy also outlines the procedures for soliciting and accepting donations, as well as the protocols for appraising and selecting materials. Archivists engage in proactive outreach efforts to raise awareness about the archives and its collecting priorities, cultivating relationships with individuals, organizations, and communities that may possess valuable records. By adhering to a collection development policy, archivists ensure that the archives’ holdings are purposeful, representative, and reflective of the mission and values of the institution, while also enabling researchers and the public to engage meaningfully with the materials preserved within the archives.
The blog was originally published on Lucidea's blog.
Get Started
Looking for archival advising, records management, and historical research services? Click below to speak with an expert consultant.
Archives often operate in environments defined by scarcity of space, staff, time, and funding. In these conditions, every decision carries weight. Without a plan, archives risk spreading their resources too thin, responding only to immediate crises, and missing opportunities for growth and impact. Strategic planning serves as a lifeline, providing archivists with a structured approach to prioritize, allocate resources, and communicate the value of their work to stakeholders.
Archivists have long recognized patterns of limited funding that shape their institutions, yet they have consistently responded with creativity, commitment, and innovation. Even when resources are scarce, archives continue to find ways to build and maintain essential infrastructure and strengthen public engagement. Each challenge underscores the importance of archivists’ labor and provides an opportunity to advocate for the central role archives play in their communities.
Archives safeguard treasures, including objects like the founding documents of a nation and photographs of defining cultural moments. These holdings inspire a sense of connection to the past, and at the heart of that work are archivists whose expertise brings these collections to life.
No archives is an island. Especially in resource-constrained environments, collaboration through shared infrastructure provides a lifeline. Consortia models turn scarcity into opportunity by spreading costs and expertise across multiple archives. By pooling resources, institutions achieve more than they could alone.
Well-resourced institutions have developed archival best practices, including comprehensive finding aids, climate-controlled storage, and digital preservation systems. For small or resource-constrained archives, these standards can feel out of reach. The danger is that the profession’s ideals may discourage institutions from taking action, leaving records vulnerable. The solution lies in paring down practices and procedures without abandoning principles.
Many archives exist within environments of chronic underfunding. Community archives, small historical societies, or lone arrangers may work with little more than donated materials, a handful of volunteers, and minimal budgets.
However, these institutions remain vital, safeguarding the histories of communities often absent from mainstream narratives. Scarcity shapes their reality, yet it can still allow meaningful work.
Humanity produces more digital content than at any other point in history. Every click, message, and post contributes to an expanding universe of data that represents the cultural memory of our time. At the center of this transformation stand archivists, the professionals uniquely trained to ensure that memories survive in the future. However, even as the scale of the challenge grows, their voices risk being sidelined in public conversations about digital preservation.
In recent years, the concept of “slow librarianship” has emerged as a thoughtful response to the accelerating pace and pressures placed upon library professionals. Drawing inspiration from the broader slow movement, it emphasizes care, reflection, ethics, and people-centered work over speed and efficiency.
The archival profession is characterized by dedication to public memory, cultural preservation, and service. However, beneath this noble mission lies a troubling reality: the increasing reliance on gig and contract labor.
Written documents have long occupied a privileged position in archives as the most authoritative memory source. However, this excludes vast repositories of knowledge that reside outside the written word, especially within Indigenous communities, where memory is often preserved and transmitted through oral traditions, performance, storytelling, ceremony, and embodied practices.
Archival description is often treated as a neutral or technical task: summarizing contents, assigning subject headings, and organizing metadata for retrieval. However, description is actually far from neutral. It shapes how users interpret records, which narratives are centered, and whose voices are made visible or erased.
As the archival profession reckons with the legacies of colonialism, more institutions and practitioners are turning toward Indigenous and decolonial approaches that reframe traditional archival practice. Central to this shift is recognizing cultural protocols and community-defined rules governing how knowledge is created, shared, accessed, and preserved. Cultural protocols are foundational to ethical, respectful, and reciprocal relationships between archives and Indigenous communities.
In recent decades, Indigenous communities and archivists have challenged the dominant frameworks that have long shaped archival practice. Traditionally, Western archival models have prioritized state authority, institutional control, and the presumption of neutrality. These models often fail to reflect Indigenous worldviews, community needs, or the rights of Indigenous peoples over their records and heritage.
As archival practice shifts to meet the challenges of the digital age, the ethical use of born-digital materials has become one of the most pressing concerns for archivists. These materials—emails, websites, text messages, digital photographs, spreadsheets, social media posts, and more—are created and stored digitally from their inception.
The fundamental principles of archival preservation focus on the agents of deterioration, preventive conservation, and essential preservation strategies applied in archival settings.
The monetary appraisal of archives and manuscripts is a critical yet underexplored intersection of library science and financial valuation. This article addresses the persistent knowledge gap between archival assessment and fiscal valuation and provides an overview of the monetary appraisal process in the United States. It focuses on concluding the fair market value (FMV) of noncash charitable contributions, a process governed by Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regulations and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). By documenting practices and terminology, the article serves as a resource for archivists navigating the complexities of donor relations and institutional stewardship. It advocates for increased fiscal literacy within the archival profession, suggesting that an integrated understanding of market dynamics and stewardship costs is essential for the care and financial substantiation of collections.
Proper archival storage is one of the most critical aspects of archival preservation. In addition to housing collections in a dedicated archival storage room, using suitable storage materials and enclosures helps protect archival collections from environmental damage, physical wear, and chemical deterioration.
One of the core challenges archivists face is determining the appropriate description level for materials in their collections. From broad collection-level overviews to granular item-level details, descriptive hierarchies play a crucial role in conveying the context and structure of archival materials.
Description is a cornerstone of archival practice, providing the means for users and archivists to understand, access, and interpret materials.
Mixed-media archives, which contain physical and digital records, present unique challenges for archival arrangement. These collections require archivists to develop strategies that address the different needs of physical and digital materials while maintaining the collection’s coherence and accessibility.
Digital records have introduced new challenges to traditional archival arrangement practices. While the principles of original order and provenance remain relevant, the nature of digital materials requires archivists to adapt these principles to new formats and technologies.
Archival arrangement organizes and structures archival materials to ensure efficient management, access, and preservation.
Redaction in archival work—obscuring or removing sensitive information from records—has become a central concern in contemporary archival ethics. As archives increasingly acquire born-digital records and digitize historical collections for online access, archivists must grapple with data privacy, access, transparency, and potential harm.
Archives have traditionally focused on preserving historical records, ensuring access, and maintaining the integrity of collections. However, in the digital age, the moral responsibilities of archivists have grown more complex.
Archives have long been viewed as bastions of memory, preservation, and historical accountability. However, archivists must confront ethical questions in an era of digital surveillance, data harvesting, and global information flows.
As archival institutions evolve from custodians of information to facilitators of memory and meaning-making, emotional engagement has become a vital, though often overlooked, dimension of archival design.
Archival reading rooms have long been the centerpiece of public access to collections. They are where researchers engage with historical documents, where discovery becomes tangible, and where the institutional identity of an archives is most visibly embodied.
Archival discovery tools, such as catalogs, finding aids, search interfaces, and digital repositories, are often the first point of contact between users and collections. These tools serve as maps and compasses, guiding users through vast and often complex holdings.
Design thinking has become a widely adopted approach in fields ranging from technology to education, prized for emphasizing empathy, experimentation, and iterative problem-solving. For archives, traditionally shaped around internal workflows and professional conventions, design thinking presents an opportunity to reimagine outreach and engagement strategies from users’ perspectives.
With shrinking resources and increasing demands, archivists cannot afford to view budgeting as an afterthought. A carefully developed budget is a strategic tool that connects an archives’ mission to its daily operations. It demonstrates accountability, supports advocacy efforts, and provides a framework for decision-making.