Acquisition is the process of acquiring records by transfer, donation, or purchase. It begins with a lead file, a way to keep track of donor contacts.
Relationships develop over time, and archivists should track any correspondence with potential donors. Background information is important too. Is the collection already in another repository or part of another collection? Is the donor talking to other repositories? Initial contact by an archivist or via a contact close to the potential donor should be treated carefully. The archivist must convince the donor of the sincerity of the repository and why their collection would be a good fit for the institution and its mission.
The examination of archival material is best done in person, although that may difficult with distant collections. Not only should archivists understand what is in the collection, but where materials are stored can be illuminating. For example, if materials are in the office, they are more likely to be of current use to the records creator than if they were in the basement. The arrangement of the office may provide clues to the collection’s provenance and original order as well. Types of storage areas also alert archivists to potential conservation problems.
The Deed of Gift
A negotiation of terms follows, which should result in an explicit agreement that covers the physical transfer, the rights of ownership, access terms, and a clarification of copyright. The legal and physical transfer of a collection to a repository should be documented, and that documentation can occur via letter, will, or most commonly, a deed of gift. In any case, the document should contain the following information:
Name of the donor, which is sometimes complicated if a person is signing on behalf of an organization.
Name of the recipient, who in the organization can legally accept materials.
Date of transfer, which might include more than one date, or later materials may be given under the terms of the earlier deed.
Description of material to distinguish among donations.
Copyright, which the donor can only transfer if they have it. For example, a donor might have physical ownership of the letters received, but the writer of the letters retains copyright.
Restrictions, which outlines who can impose them, who can lift them, and to whom do restrictions apply.
Disposal authority because the archives may want to discard items from a collection. Does the donor agree, or do they want everything returned?
Additions, if subsequent gifts are possible.
Physical Transfer
The physical transfer is also best done in person for several reasons. The archivist can note where materials were stored before packing and can be clear as to what is next to what in the containers and the number the containers. Archivists can also get a lot of information from the donor during this process, information that is likely to be useful later during arrangement and description.
Archivists also follow-up after the transfer. Acknowledgment of the collection is essential, as is following through on other donor wishes or resolving any disputes of the agreement.
Some Bumps on the Road
The acquisition process is not always straightforward. For example, archivists need to make sure that the person has the right to donate the material, which is not always the case and sometimes unclear.
Monetary appraisal may be an issue. When donors ask for an appraisal for tax purposes, archivists must refer donors to qualified appraisers and cannot be a party to the transaction.
Handling Restrictions
There is also the matter of restrictions. Materials can be confidential by law or can contain information that necessitates closure or limited access. Archivists should determine this at the time of transfer, and any restrictions should be articulated in the gift agreement.
While archivists try to make as much material open as soon as possible, they also recognize privacy issues. Sometimes the donor brings them up; sometimes, the archivist uncovers such material during an examination of the collection. Restrictions do not have to apply to the entire collection; they can apply only to relevant series or files. Restrictions should be clear and equally applied to all users and have an endpoint. Restrictions can result in files being closed or require the permission of the archivist. Restrictions can also indicate that individual names cannot be used in cases where aggregate data is permissible, but not the release of personally identifiable information.
Procuring Comprehensive Holdings
Acquisition allows the archival institution to make decisions and allocate resources. It permits the repository to procure comprehensive holdings in a planned, coordinated, and systematic manner. The process is a basis for acquisition strategies and helps plan for the efficient identification and preservation of archival materials.
The blog was originally published on Lucidea's blog.
Archives often operate in environments defined by scarcity of space, staff, time, and funding. In these conditions, every decision carries weight. Without a plan, archives risk spreading their resources too thin, responding only to immediate crises, and missing opportunities for growth and impact. Strategic planning serves as a lifeline, providing archivists with a structured approach to prioritize, allocate resources, and communicate the value of their work to stakeholders.
Archivists have long recognized patterns of limited funding that shape their institutions, yet they have consistently responded with creativity, commitment, and innovation. Even when resources are scarce, archives continue to find ways to build and maintain essential infrastructure and strengthen public engagement. Each challenge underscores the importance of archivists’ labor and provides an opportunity to advocate for the central role archives play in their communities.
Archives safeguard treasures, including objects like the founding documents of a nation and photographs of defining cultural moments. These holdings inspire a sense of connection to the past, and at the heart of that work are archivists whose expertise brings these collections to life.
No archives is an island. Especially in resource-constrained environments, collaboration through shared infrastructure provides a lifeline. Consortia models turn scarcity into opportunity by spreading costs and expertise across multiple archives. By pooling resources, institutions achieve more than they could alone.
Well-resourced institutions have developed archival best practices, including comprehensive finding aids, climate-controlled storage, and digital preservation systems. For small or resource-constrained archives, these standards can feel out of reach. The danger is that the profession’s ideals may discourage institutions from taking action, leaving records vulnerable. The solution lies in paring down practices and procedures without abandoning principles.
Many archives exist within environments of chronic underfunding. Community archives, small historical societies, or lone arrangers may work with little more than donated materials, a handful of volunteers, and minimal budgets.
However, these institutions remain vital, safeguarding the histories of communities often absent from mainstream narratives. Scarcity shapes their reality, yet it can still allow meaningful work.
Humanity produces more digital content than at any other point in history. Every click, message, and post contributes to an expanding universe of data that represents the cultural memory of our time. At the center of this transformation stand archivists, the professionals uniquely trained to ensure that memories survive in the future. However, even as the scale of the challenge grows, their voices risk being sidelined in public conversations about digital preservation.
In recent years, the concept of “slow librarianship” has emerged as a thoughtful response to the accelerating pace and pressures placed upon library professionals. Drawing inspiration from the broader slow movement, it emphasizes care, reflection, ethics, and people-centered work over speed and efficiency.
The archival profession is characterized by dedication to public memory, cultural preservation, and service. However, beneath this noble mission lies a troubling reality: the increasing reliance on gig and contract labor.
Written documents have long occupied a privileged position in archives as the most authoritative memory source. However, this excludes vast repositories of knowledge that reside outside the written word, especially within Indigenous communities, where memory is often preserved and transmitted through oral traditions, performance, storytelling, ceremony, and embodied practices.
Archival description is often treated as a neutral or technical task: summarizing contents, assigning subject headings, and organizing metadata for retrieval. However, description is actually far from neutral. It shapes how users interpret records, which narratives are centered, and whose voices are made visible or erased.
As the archival profession reckons with the legacies of colonialism, more institutions and practitioners are turning toward Indigenous and decolonial approaches that reframe traditional archival practice. Central to this shift is recognizing cultural protocols and community-defined rules governing how knowledge is created, shared, accessed, and preserved. Cultural protocols are foundational to ethical, respectful, and reciprocal relationships between archives and Indigenous communities.
In recent decades, Indigenous communities and archivists have challenged the dominant frameworks that have long shaped archival practice. Traditionally, Western archival models have prioritized state authority, institutional control, and the presumption of neutrality. These models often fail to reflect Indigenous worldviews, community needs, or the rights of Indigenous peoples over their records and heritage.
As archival practice shifts to meet the challenges of the digital age, the ethical use of born-digital materials has become one of the most pressing concerns for archivists. These materials—emails, websites, text messages, digital photographs, spreadsheets, social media posts, and more—are created and stored digitally from their inception.
The fundamental principles of archival preservation focus on the agents of deterioration, preventive conservation, and essential preservation strategies applied in archival settings.
The monetary appraisal of archives and manuscripts is a critical yet underexplored intersection of library science and financial valuation. This article addresses the persistent knowledge gap between archival assessment and fiscal valuation and provides an overview of the monetary appraisal process in the United States. It focuses on concluding the fair market value (FMV) of noncash charitable contributions, a process governed by Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regulations and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). By documenting practices and terminology, the article serves as a resource for archivists navigating the complexities of donor relations and institutional stewardship. It advocates for increased fiscal literacy within the archival profession, suggesting that an integrated understanding of market dynamics and stewardship costs is essential for the care and financial substantiation of collections.
Proper archival storage is one of the most critical aspects of archival preservation. In addition to housing collections in a dedicated archival storage room, using suitable storage materials and enclosures helps protect archival collections from environmental damage, physical wear, and chemical deterioration.
One of the core challenges archivists face is determining the appropriate description level for materials in their collections. From broad collection-level overviews to granular item-level details, descriptive hierarchies play a crucial role in conveying the context and structure of archival materials.
Description is a cornerstone of archival practice, providing the means for users and archivists to understand, access, and interpret materials.
Mixed-media archives, which contain physical and digital records, present unique challenges for archival arrangement. These collections require archivists to develop strategies that address the different needs of physical and digital materials while maintaining the collection’s coherence and accessibility.
Digital records have introduced new challenges to traditional archival arrangement practices. While the principles of original order and provenance remain relevant, the nature of digital materials requires archivists to adapt these principles to new formats and technologies.
Archival arrangement organizes and structures archival materials to ensure efficient management, access, and preservation.
Redaction in archival work—obscuring or removing sensitive information from records—has become a central concern in contemporary archival ethics. As archives increasingly acquire born-digital records and digitize historical collections for online access, archivists must grapple with data privacy, access, transparency, and potential harm.
Archives have traditionally focused on preserving historical records, ensuring access, and maintaining the integrity of collections. However, in the digital age, the moral responsibilities of archivists have grown more complex.
Archives have long been viewed as bastions of memory, preservation, and historical accountability. However, archivists must confront ethical questions in an era of digital surveillance, data harvesting, and global information flows.
As archival institutions evolve from custodians of information to facilitators of memory and meaning-making, emotional engagement has become a vital, though often overlooked, dimension of archival design.
Archival reading rooms have long been the centerpiece of public access to collections. They are where researchers engage with historical documents, where discovery becomes tangible, and where the institutional identity of an archives is most visibly embodied.
Archival discovery tools, such as catalogs, finding aids, search interfaces, and digital repositories, are often the first point of contact between users and collections. These tools serve as maps and compasses, guiding users through vast and often complex holdings.
Design thinking has become a widely adopted approach in fields ranging from technology to education, prized for emphasizing empathy, experimentation, and iterative problem-solving. For archives, traditionally shaped around internal workflows and professional conventions, design thinking presents an opportunity to reimagine outreach and engagement strategies from users’ perspectives.
With shrinking resources and increasing demands, archivists cannot afford to view budgeting as an afterthought. A carefully developed budget is a strategic tool that connects an archives’ mission to its daily operations. It demonstrates accountability, supports advocacy efforts, and provides a framework for decision-making.