Prior to archival digitization, archivists should be aware of areas of concern, and remember that different international laws apply to these problematic categories.
For example, archivists must proceed with caution regarding sensitive content regarding cultural property, anthropological images, or materials related to Native Americans. Additionally, with materials that involve people photographed against their will or in exploitative situations, archivists should be sensitive to the context of how the materials were collected and consider how they will present such content.
Publicity, Privacy, and Restrictions
The right of publicity is associated with public figures. Publicity rights address commercial gain in one’s name, likeness, voice, persona, or other commercial aspects of personality. Laws vary internationally and state by state in the United States. A further complication is that this right may continue in some regions after death, but in others, it ends at the subject’s death.
The right to privacy relates to private citizens, though exceptions exist. Privacy rights are noncommercial and protect people from intrusion into their private affairs and the public disclosure of private information. If the materials are intrusive, the likelihood of obtaining permission from the subject is slim. The right to privacy ends at death. Organizations will have different stances regarding the potential for controversy created by distributing images others could perceive as violating privacy.
Records may have donor restrictions, including limitations stipulated by the donating individual or organization on access to or use of materials. For example, the restrictions may require that portions of a collection be closed for some time or that a credit line is used if the collection’s materials are used.
Obscenity and pornography are complex areas of law where one must tread carefully. Images including nudity, especially involving children, are problematic.
Archivists should perform digital manipulation on a copy of the unprocessed file. The original file is the standard to which the final image should be compared. Archivists should document deliberate deviations, such as cropping. Institutions may wish to establish a code of ethics for creating, manipulating, and distributing files. A policy will help authenticate image files and establish the institution as a credible source of historical materials.
Copyright Issues
Copyright provides a limited monopoly permitting authors to profit from their creative efforts and, eventually, for the public to use works such that usage will inspire new creations benefiting society. Therefore, when creative work is not subject to copyright protection, it is referred to as being in the public domain.
Fair use is a legal concept unique to the United States that provides a defense against copyright infringement. It allows users to copy an otherwise protected work without permission from the copyright owner. Some countries have a similar concept called fair dealing, but it is usually more restrictive. Fair use deals with certain kinds of copying that, under specific circumstances, were deemed excusable for public policy reasons. Fair use is only available for limited purposes such as criticism, comment, reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Rights management has significant implications for digitization initiatives. Most institutions select records for digitization in which they own the copyright, or the records have transitioned into the public domain. Institutions may wish to investigate unknown copyrights depending on the available resources. If permissions are unforthcoming, the materials cannot be reproduced, and the project’s focus should change. If there are limited means for investigation, archivists should concentrate on items whose rights are owned by the organization.
Once digital images are available online, organizations should protect their rights. The ubiquity of the Internet exacerbates copyright and legal issues. The potential for unauthorized use of materials online means that access cannot be managed as carefully as in traditional settings, where access restrictions allow archives to present sensitive materials with commentary, background materials, and guidance.
Access, when not universal, must be managed through passwords, fees, or other means. Institutions can offer various viewing, downloading, and printing capabilities to users. A simple method for protection includes copyright statements and usage guidelines. For example, users agree to abide by the rules on a website before viewing digital files. Access could also be limited to registered users or users logging on from the institutions’ domain name or IP address. Additionally, institutions may add captions or watermarks, or encrypt the images.
Legal Matters
Institutions should make enterprise-wide decisions on copyright and protections. Archivists should have access to up-to-date information and keep documentation about legal matters relating to their collections. The presentation of material on the Internet is inherently international, so archivists should be aware of the larger context of global access. It is worthwhile, especially with a digitization project, to have legal advice concerning copyright, as the law varies internationally.
The blog was originally published on Lucidea's blog.
Get Started
Looking for archival advising, records management, and historical research services? Click below to speak with an expert consultant.
Archives often operate in environments defined by scarcity of space, staff, time, and funding. In these conditions, every decision carries weight. Without a plan, archives risk spreading their resources too thin, responding only to immediate crises, and missing opportunities for growth and impact. Strategic planning serves as a lifeline, providing archivists with a structured approach to prioritize, allocate resources, and communicate the value of their work to stakeholders.
Archivists have long recognized patterns of limited funding that shape their institutions, yet they have consistently responded with creativity, commitment, and innovation. Even when resources are scarce, archives continue to find ways to build and maintain essential infrastructure and strengthen public engagement. Each challenge underscores the importance of archivists’ labor and provides an opportunity to advocate for the central role archives play in their communities.
Archives safeguard treasures, including objects like the founding documents of a nation and photographs of defining cultural moments. These holdings inspire a sense of connection to the past, and at the heart of that work are archivists whose expertise brings these collections to life.
No archives is an island. Especially in resource-constrained environments, collaboration through shared infrastructure provides a lifeline. Consortia models turn scarcity into opportunity by spreading costs and expertise across multiple archives. By pooling resources, institutions achieve more than they could alone.
Well-resourced institutions have developed archival best practices, including comprehensive finding aids, climate-controlled storage, and digital preservation systems. For small or resource-constrained archives, these standards can feel out of reach. The danger is that the profession’s ideals may discourage institutions from taking action, leaving records vulnerable. The solution lies in paring down practices and procedures without abandoning principles.
Many archives exist within environments of chronic underfunding. Community archives, small historical societies, or lone arrangers may work with little more than donated materials, a handful of volunteers, and minimal budgets.
However, these institutions remain vital, safeguarding the histories of communities often absent from mainstream narratives. Scarcity shapes their reality, yet it can still allow meaningful work.
Humanity produces more digital content than at any other point in history. Every click, message, and post contributes to an expanding universe of data that represents the cultural memory of our time. At the center of this transformation stand archivists, the professionals uniquely trained to ensure that memories survive in the future. However, even as the scale of the challenge grows, their voices risk being sidelined in public conversations about digital preservation.
In recent years, the concept of “slow librarianship” has emerged as a thoughtful response to the accelerating pace and pressures placed upon library professionals. Drawing inspiration from the broader slow movement, it emphasizes care, reflection, ethics, and people-centered work over speed and efficiency.
The archival profession is characterized by dedication to public memory, cultural preservation, and service. However, beneath this noble mission lies a troubling reality: the increasing reliance on gig and contract labor.
Written documents have long occupied a privileged position in archives as the most authoritative memory source. However, this excludes vast repositories of knowledge that reside outside the written word, especially within Indigenous communities, where memory is often preserved and transmitted through oral traditions, performance, storytelling, ceremony, and embodied practices.
Archival description is often treated as a neutral or technical task: summarizing contents, assigning subject headings, and organizing metadata for retrieval. However, description is actually far from neutral. It shapes how users interpret records, which narratives are centered, and whose voices are made visible or erased.
As the archival profession reckons with the legacies of colonialism, more institutions and practitioners are turning toward Indigenous and decolonial approaches that reframe traditional archival practice. Central to this shift is recognizing cultural protocols and community-defined rules governing how knowledge is created, shared, accessed, and preserved. Cultural protocols are foundational to ethical, respectful, and reciprocal relationships between archives and Indigenous communities.
In recent decades, Indigenous communities and archivists have challenged the dominant frameworks that have long shaped archival practice. Traditionally, Western archival models have prioritized state authority, institutional control, and the presumption of neutrality. These models often fail to reflect Indigenous worldviews, community needs, or the rights of Indigenous peoples over their records and heritage.
As archival practice shifts to meet the challenges of the digital age, the ethical use of born-digital materials has become one of the most pressing concerns for archivists. These materials—emails, websites, text messages, digital photographs, spreadsheets, social media posts, and more—are created and stored digitally from their inception.
The fundamental principles of archival preservation focus on the agents of deterioration, preventive conservation, and essential preservation strategies applied in archival settings.
The monetary appraisal of archives and manuscripts is a critical yet underexplored intersection of library science and financial valuation. This article addresses the persistent knowledge gap between archival assessment and fiscal valuation and provides an overview of the monetary appraisal process in the United States. It focuses on concluding the fair market value (FMV) of noncash charitable contributions, a process governed by Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regulations and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). By documenting practices and terminology, the article serves as a resource for archivists navigating the complexities of donor relations and institutional stewardship. It advocates for increased fiscal literacy within the archival profession, suggesting that an integrated understanding of market dynamics and stewardship costs is essential for the care and financial substantiation of collections.
Proper archival storage is one of the most critical aspects of archival preservation. In addition to housing collections in a dedicated archival storage room, using suitable storage materials and enclosures helps protect archival collections from environmental damage, physical wear, and chemical deterioration.
One of the core challenges archivists face is determining the appropriate description level for materials in their collections. From broad collection-level overviews to granular item-level details, descriptive hierarchies play a crucial role in conveying the context and structure of archival materials.
Description is a cornerstone of archival practice, providing the means for users and archivists to understand, access, and interpret materials.
Mixed-media archives, which contain physical and digital records, present unique challenges for archival arrangement. These collections require archivists to develop strategies that address the different needs of physical and digital materials while maintaining the collection’s coherence and accessibility.
Digital records have introduced new challenges to traditional archival arrangement practices. While the principles of original order and provenance remain relevant, the nature of digital materials requires archivists to adapt these principles to new formats and technologies.
Archival arrangement organizes and structures archival materials to ensure efficient management, access, and preservation.
Redaction in archival work—obscuring or removing sensitive information from records—has become a central concern in contemporary archival ethics. As archives increasingly acquire born-digital records and digitize historical collections for online access, archivists must grapple with data privacy, access, transparency, and potential harm.
Archives have traditionally focused on preserving historical records, ensuring access, and maintaining the integrity of collections. However, in the digital age, the moral responsibilities of archivists have grown more complex.
Archives have long been viewed as bastions of memory, preservation, and historical accountability. However, archivists must confront ethical questions in an era of digital surveillance, data harvesting, and global information flows.
As archival institutions evolve from custodians of information to facilitators of memory and meaning-making, emotional engagement has become a vital, though often overlooked, dimension of archival design.
Archival reading rooms have long been the centerpiece of public access to collections. They are where researchers engage with historical documents, where discovery becomes tangible, and where the institutional identity of an archives is most visibly embodied.
Archival discovery tools, such as catalogs, finding aids, search interfaces, and digital repositories, are often the first point of contact between users and collections. These tools serve as maps and compasses, guiding users through vast and often complex holdings.
Design thinking has become a widely adopted approach in fields ranging from technology to education, prized for emphasizing empathy, experimentation, and iterative problem-solving. For archives, traditionally shaped around internal workflows and professional conventions, design thinking presents an opportunity to reimagine outreach and engagement strategies from users’ perspectives.
With shrinking resources and increasing demands, archivists cannot afford to view budgeting as an afterthought. A carefully developed budget is a strategic tool that connects an archives’ mission to its daily operations. It demonstrates accountability, supports advocacy efforts, and provides a framework for decision-making.